Foreword:

By Michaela Jefferson, freelance journalist and former Marketing Week news editor

When I first began paying attention to attention around five years ago, it was only just starting to gain serious momentum. Dr. Karen Nelson-Field had just published her seminal book ‘The Attention Economy and How Media Works’, Co-op had bought the first ever “attention-optimised” programmatic campaign using Lumen Research data, and The Attention Council (now the CIMM’s Attention Working Group) was holding its first formal UK session.

Things have come a long way since then. Today, it is an IAB-recognised metric, and with the Media Rating Council’s support, the IAB’s Attention Measurement Task Force is looking to accredit attention measurement vendors. The debate has shifted from questioning whether attention matters to exploring how best to harness its value.

A lot of trends take flight in adland, but the attention movement has always stood out as one with genuine wings. After all, when two-fifths of overall ad spend reportedly goes to waste, how could anyone argue that a way of ensuring ads are actually seen and absorbed isn’t a good thing?

Of course, people do argue about it – and about a lot of other things to do with attention. In this MAD//Fest report, Lumen Research – one of the pioneers of the attention movement – offers its (sometimes quite spicy) opinion on five of the most contentious debates raging today. 

It’s an interesting read, with lots of food for thought. And ultimately, the fact these discussions are happening is a sign of progress. 

As former industry journalist Dominic Mills once wrote: “The fact that it is highly unlikely we will ever reach consensus on these questions may not, in the end, be that important. What really matters is that agencies and advertisers factor in attention right at the beginning of any campaigns they run.”

Read the full article, enter your details